<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (11) TMI 47 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97772</link>
    <description>The court clarified the necessity of court leave for issuing subpoenas on the Registrar of Companies, emphasizing the judge&#039;s role in determining the need for original document production. The decision set aside the vague subpoena and ordered the petitioner to bear their own costs, highlighting the importance of clarity and adherence to legal procedures in document requests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:37:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (11) TMI 47 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97772</link>
      <description>The court clarified the necessity of court leave for issuing subpoenas on the Registrar of Companies, emphasizing the judge&#039;s role in determining the need for original document production. The decision set aside the vague subpoena and ordered the petitioner to bear their own costs, highlighting the importance of clarity and adherence to legal procedures in document requests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>