<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 599 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97769</link>
    <description>The judgment addressed allegations of clandestine production and clearance of PET bottles without duty payment, confiscating machinery and imposing penalties. It ruled that duty demand on imported machinery under the EOU scheme was premature and against the scheme&#039;s purpose, ordering a re-computation of duty demand and fresh adjudication by the Commissioner. The appellants were permitted to resume production, with their machinery released and a deposit held by Revenue for adjustment towards duty in the final adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:28:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 599 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97769</link>
      <description>The judgment addressed allegations of clandestine production and clearance of PET bottles without duty payment, confiscating machinery and imposing penalties. It ruled that duty demand on imported machinery under the EOU scheme was premature and against the scheme&#039;s purpose, ordering a re-computation of duty demand and fresh adjudication by the Commissioner. The appellants were permitted to resume production, with their machinery released and a deposit held by Revenue for adjustment towards duty in the final adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>