<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 635 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97752</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the importation of paper shredders without an import license. The Tribunal disagreed with the Commissioner&#039;s classification of the paper shredders as consumer goods, stating that they did not align with the definition provided in the Policy. Highlighting the limited scope of use of paper shredders compared to other devices, the Tribunal set aside the order of confiscation and penalty, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:35:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 635 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97752</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the importation of paper shredders without an import license. The Tribunal disagreed with the Commissioner&#039;s classification of the paper shredders as consumer goods, stating that they did not align with the definition provided in the Policy. Highlighting the limited scope of use of paper shredders compared to other devices, the Tribunal set aside the order of confiscation and penalty, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>