<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (8) TMI 44 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97739</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner company could claim the privileges granted by Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The Controller&#039;s actions were unauthorized under the Control Order, and the power to revoke permits without restrictions was an unreasonable restriction on the petitioner&#039;s fundamental rights. The petition was allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:09:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (8) TMI 44 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97739</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner company could claim the privileges granted by Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The Controller&#039;s actions were unauthorized under the Control Order, and the power to revoke permits without restrictions was an unreasonable restriction on the petitioner&#039;s fundamental rights. The petition was allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>