https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97738 Part IIIA's special statutory scheme for banking-company winding up overrides inconsistent Companies Act provisions, so appeal rights under general company law must be read subject to the Banking Act's appeal restriction; accordingly appeals are barred where the Banking Act precludes them. Proceedings under section 235 read with the Banking Act's special procedure are properly characterised as civil proceedings for appeal restriction purposes. Orders made under that procedure, although enforceable like decrees, are not decrees proprio vigore for Court Fees Act Article (1), so an additional ad valorem fee is not payable and the fixed fee suffices. en-us Wed, 24 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:07:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97738 Part IIIA's special statutory scheme for banking-company winding up overrides inconsistent Companies Act provisions, so appeal rights under general company law must be read subject to the Banking Act's appeal restriction; accordingly appeals are barred where the Banking Act precludes them. Proceedings under section 235 read with the Banking Act's special procedure are properly characterised as civil proceedings for appeal restriction purposes. Orders made under that procedure, although enforceable like decrees, are not decrees proprio vigore for Court Fees Act Article (1), so an additional ad valorem fee is not payable and the fixed fee suffices. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 24 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97738