<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 578 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97728</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for de novo consideration. The Commissioner was directed to hear the appellants on the right to cross-examine witnesses and to provide findings on duty computation, manufacture, and clearance of goods. The Commissioner was instructed to address all the pleas raised by the appellants and ensure a thorough examination of the evidence and quantification of duty. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for a fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:52:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 578 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97728</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for de novo consideration. The Commissioner was directed to hear the appellants on the right to cross-examine witnesses and to provide findings on duty computation, manufacture, and clearance of goods. The Commissioner was instructed to address all the pleas raised by the appellants and ensure a thorough examination of the evidence and quantification of duty. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for a fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>