<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (2) TMI 33 - HIGH COURT OF ASSAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97717</link>
    <description>A valid assignment of a matured fixed deposit transfers the creditor&#039;s rights to the assignee on execution, and notice to the debtor is sufficient to recognise that substitution. A moratorium order restraining actions against a bank does not, by itself, extinguish the underlying debt or defeat a lawful assignment, and a later scheme of arrangement binds only the creditors within its relevant class. Cheques tendered for credit to an overdraft account may also operate as payment or credit for set-off purposes where the negotiable instrument has the legal effect of discharging the drawer&#039;s liability. The combined set-off exhausted the bank&#039;s claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:39:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (2) TMI 33 - HIGH COURT OF ASSAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97717</link>
      <description>A valid assignment of a matured fixed deposit transfers the creditor&#039;s rights to the assignee on execution, and notice to the debtor is sufficient to recognise that substitution. A moratorium order restraining actions against a bank does not, by itself, extinguish the underlying debt or defeat a lawful assignment, and a later scheme of arrangement binds only the creditors within its relevant class. Cheques tendered for credit to an overdraft account may also operate as payment or credit for set-off purposes where the negotiable instrument has the legal effect of discharging the drawer&#039;s liability. The combined set-off exhausted the bank&#039;s claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>