<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 572 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97711</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on aluminium ingots was treated as admissible where the dealer&#039;s invoice mentioned the commercial invoice particulars but those particulars could be traced to the duty-related invoice issued under Rule 52A, so the discrepancy was regarded as a mere misdescription and the condition in Notification No. 15/94-C.E. (N.T.) was satisfied. Credit was also allowed where the original duty paying documents were shown to have been filed with the RT-12 return, supported by the covering letter and document list, so the requirement under Rule 57G was held fulfilled. The document states that credit should not be denied when prescribed duty-paying particulars are substantially traceable through the records and the statutory return contains the relevant originals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:26:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 572 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97711</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on aluminium ingots was treated as admissible where the dealer&#039;s invoice mentioned the commercial invoice particulars but those particulars could be traced to the duty-related invoice issued under Rule 52A, so the discrepancy was regarded as a mere misdescription and the condition in Notification No. 15/94-C.E. (N.T.) was satisfied. Credit was also allowed where the original duty paying documents were shown to have been filed with the RT-12 return, supported by the covering letter and document list, so the requirement under Rule 57G was held fulfilled. The document states that credit should not be denied when prescribed duty-paying particulars are substantially traceable through the records and the statutory return contains the relevant originals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>