<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (7) TMI 25 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97709</link>
    <description>Where a provisional liquidator has been appointed but is no longer in charge of the company&#039;s assets, a suit in the company&#039;s name verified by a director meets the formal requirements and is maintainable; statutory provisions charging a provisional liquidator with custody and sole authority to sue are operative only while the liquidator controls assets, and cease to bar proceedings once control is lost. Objections to the plaintiff&#039;s authority to sue must be raised by appropriate summary application (strike out or stay) rather than left as a defence at trial, and the plaint is not demurrable solely for the prior appointment of a provisional liquidator.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:23:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (7) TMI 25 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97709</link>
      <description>Where a provisional liquidator has been appointed but is no longer in charge of the company&#039;s assets, a suit in the company&#039;s name verified by a director meets the formal requirements and is maintainable; statutory provisions charging a provisional liquidator with custody and sole authority to sue are operative only while the liquidator controls assets, and cease to bar proceedings once control is lost. Objections to the plaintiff&#039;s authority to sue must be raised by appropriate summary application (strike out or stay) rather than left as a defence at trial, and the plaint is not demurrable solely for the prior appointment of a provisional liquidator.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>