<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 568 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97705</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed three appeals by appellants against penalties for importing limestone instead of marble. The Commissioner&#039;s reliance on Geological Survey of India&#039;s report without allowing re-testing or cross-examination was deemed insufficient. The appellants were denied a fair opportunity to defend their case, so the Commissioner&#039;s order was set aside, and appeals were allowed for cross-examination of testing officers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:14:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 568 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97705</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed three appeals by appellants against penalties for importing limestone instead of marble. The Commissioner&#039;s reliance on Geological Survey of India&#039;s report without allowing re-testing or cross-examination was deemed insufficient. The appellants were denied a fair opportunity to defend their case, so the Commissioner&#039;s order was set aside, and appeals were allowed for cross-examination of testing officers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>