<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 566 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97703</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi rejected the appeal by M/s. Rama Steel Rolling Mills for a refund claim, ruling that sanctioning the refund would lead to unjust enrichment as the burden of duty had been passed on to the buyers, as indicated by the composite price in the invoices. The decision was grounded on the principle of unjust enrichment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:12:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 566 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97703</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi rejected the appeal by M/s. Rama Steel Rolling Mills for a refund claim, ruling that sanctioning the refund would lead to unjust enrichment as the burden of duty had been passed on to the buyers, as indicated by the composite price in the invoices. The decision was grounded on the principle of unjust enrichment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>