https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97702 The Supreme Court held that legal proceedings under section 153-C of the Companies Act of 1913 could continue post-repeal under section 6 of the General Clauses Act. The Court found that the Companies Act of 1956 did not manifest an intention to abolish rights created by the previous Act. It was clarified that changes in jurisdiction did not imply an intention to destroy existing rights, and the District Judge retained jurisdiction to hear the application. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions, with costs awarded to the Respondents. en-us Mon, 22 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97702 The Supreme Court held that legal proceedings under section 153-C of the Companies Act of 1913 could continue post-repeal under section 6 of the General Clauses Act. The Court found that the Companies Act of 1956 did not manifest an intention to abolish rights created by the previous Act. It was clarified that changes in jurisdiction did not imply an intention to destroy existing rights, and the District Judge retained jurisdiction to hear the application. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions, with costs awarded to the Respondents. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 22 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97702