https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97702 Proceedings initiated under section 153-C of the Companies Act, 1913 survived repeal by the Companies Act, 1956 because section 6 of the General Clauses Act preserved accrued rights and pending proceedings unless a contrary intention appeared. The later Act did not show any intention to extinguish rights created under the earlier enactment, especially where the relevant provisions were substantially re-enacted. Section 658 of the 1956 Act preserved the operation of section 6, while section 10 dealt only with future jurisdiction under the new regime. Section 24 of the General Clauses Act did not terminate the earlier notification, so the application remained maintainable before the District Judge. en-us Mon, 22 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97702 Proceedings initiated under section 153-C of the Companies Act, 1913 survived repeal by the Companies Act, 1956 because section 6 of the General Clauses Act preserved accrued rights and pending proceedings unless a contrary intention appeared. The later Act did not show any intention to extinguish rights created under the earlier enactment, especially where the relevant provisions were substantially re-enacted. Section 658 of the 1956 Act preserved the operation of section 6, while section 10 dealt only with future jurisdiction under the new regime. Section 24 of the General Clauses Act did not terminate the earlier notification, so the application remained maintainable before the District Judge. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 22 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97702