<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (2) TMI 30 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97698</link>
    <description>Compensation paid to outgoing directors for loss of office may be deducted as business expenditure where it terminates an expensive management arrangement and facilitates more efficient business operations. Directors&#039; remuneration and tenure fixed by the articles of association may establish a contractual arrangement, but deductibility can also rest on commercial expediency. Expenditure need not have a direct or immediate connection with earning profits if it is incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes and is not capital in nature. The payment reduced recurring costs and improved operational supervision, supporting its treatment as an allowable deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (2) TMI 30 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97698</link>
      <description>Compensation paid to outgoing directors for loss of office may be deducted as business expenditure where it terminates an expensive management arrangement and facilitates more efficient business operations. Directors&#039; remuneration and tenure fixed by the articles of association may establish a contractual arrangement, but deductibility can also rest on commercial expediency. Expenditure need not have a direct or immediate connection with earning profits if it is incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes and is not capital in nature. The payment reduced recurring costs and improved operational supervision, supporting its treatment as an allowable deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>