<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (2) TMI 30 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97698</link>
    <description>Question whether payments to directors on premature termination were deductible as business expenditure under the statutory business-purpose test; court held payments fell within contractual obligations under the articles or, alternatively, were incurred for commercial expediency to terminate an uneconomic method of carrying on business, and therefore constituted revenue expenditure &quot;wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business&quot; after the post 1939 widening of the statutory phrase. Precedents on termination payments and agency/service cessation were applied and the payment was held allowable in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (2) TMI 30 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97698</link>
      <description>Question whether payments to directors on premature termination were deductible as business expenditure under the statutory business-purpose test; court held payments fell within contractual obligations under the articles or, alternatively, were incurred for commercial expediency to terminate an uneconomic method of carrying on business, and therefore constituted revenue expenditure &quot;wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business&quot; after the post 1939 widening of the statutory phrase. Precedents on termination payments and agency/service cessation were applied and the payment was held allowable in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>