<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (11) TMI 24 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97691</link>
    <description>The court held that the compensation payable to workmen on termination of services was rightly limited to three months&#039; average pay due to the closure of the undertaking under unavoidable circumstances. The court also determined that the Industrial Tribunal&#039;s award regarding annual increments and strike wages for staff members was valid, as leave under section 446 of the Companies Act was not required for proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act. The petitions were allowed, directing the petitioners to file statements for amounts due, verified by the liquidator who was also ordered to pay petitioners&#039; costs from the company&#039;s assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:53:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (11) TMI 24 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97691</link>
      <description>The court held that the compensation payable to workmen on termination of services was rightly limited to three months&#039; average pay due to the closure of the undertaking under unavoidable circumstances. The court also determined that the Industrial Tribunal&#039;s award regarding annual increments and strike wages for staff members was valid, as leave under section 446 of the Companies Act was not required for proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act. The petitions were allowed, directing the petitioners to file statements for amounts due, verified by the liquidator who was also ordered to pay petitioners&#039; costs from the company&#039;s assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>