https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97675 The article concludes that section 141A of the Indian Companies Act does not by its terms oust prosecutions by persons other than those listed; because sections 138-141 create an inspection and reporting scheme without express exclusion of private or alternative prosecutions, prior authorities treating section 141A as enabling support this construction. Consequently the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies was competent to prefer the complaint and the Magistrate retained jurisdiction to try the case; the revision petition was dismissed. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:15:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97675 The article concludes that section 141A of the Indian Companies Act does not by its terms oust prosecutions by persons other than those listed; because sections 138-141 create an inspection and reporting scheme without express exclusion of private or alternative prosecutions, prior authorities treating section 141A as enabling support this construction. Consequently the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies was competent to prefer the complaint and the Magistrate retained jurisdiction to try the case; the revision petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 04 Sep 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97675