<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 622 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97671</link>
    <description>The appellants&#039; application to modify the Tribunal&#039;s Stay Order, seeking a waiver of the pre-deposit requirement, was rejected. The Tribunal&#039;s Vice President supported the appellants&#039; arguments, but the Member (Judicial) and Third Member (Technical) upheld the original order, emphasizing the need for the pre-deposit. The appellants were directed to deposit Rs. 50 lakhs by a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:16:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 622 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97671</link>
      <description>The appellants&#039; application to modify the Tribunal&#039;s Stay Order, seeking a waiver of the pre-deposit requirement, was rejected. The Tribunal&#039;s Vice President supported the appellants&#039; arguments, but the Member (Judicial) and Third Member (Technical) upheld the original order, emphasizing the need for the pre-deposit. The appellants were directed to deposit Rs. 50 lakhs by a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>