<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (8) TMI 23 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97669</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application as the applicants did not claim relief for an apprehended civil claim under Section 633(2) of the Companies Act. Since no proceedings were pending, relief under Section 633(1) could not be granted. The court clarified that relief against possible criminal prosecutions cannot be granted in anticipation but only once prosecution starts. Relief for possible civil liabilities can be granted in advance under Section 633(2). The application was therefore dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:13:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (8) TMI 23 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97669</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application as the applicants did not claim relief for an apprehended civil claim under Section 633(2) of the Companies Act. Since no proceedings were pending, relief under Section 633(1) could not be granted. The court clarified that relief against possible criminal prosecutions cannot be granted in anticipation but only once prosecution starts. Relief for possible civil liabilities can be granted in advance under Section 633(2). The application was therefore dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>