<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (7) TMI 25 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97660</link>
    <description>The court held that the Madras City Civil Court does not qualify as a &quot;District Court&quot; under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, and lacks jurisdiction to handle matters under section 10(2) of the Act. Therefore, the petition seeking an extension of time for registration of a charge modification was dismissed, indicating that such matters should be addressed by the High Court rather than the Madras City Civil Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:01:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (7) TMI 25 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97660</link>
      <description>The court held that the Madras City Civil Court does not qualify as a &quot;District Court&quot; under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, and lacks jurisdiction to handle matters under section 10(2) of the Act. Therefore, the petition seeking an extension of time for registration of a charge modification was dismissed, indicating that such matters should be addressed by the High Court rather than the Madras City Civil Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>