<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (3) TMI 38 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97652</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the official liquidator&#039;s decision and the judgment of Subrahmanyam, J., that the appellant&#039;s claim to be recognized as a secured creditor was rightly rejected. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the statutory requirements for registering charges and the consequences of failing to do so. The appeal was dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:51:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (3) TMI 38 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97652</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the official liquidator&#039;s decision and the judgment of Subrahmanyam, J., that the appellant&#039;s claim to be recognized as a secured creditor was rightly rejected. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the statutory requirements for registering charges and the consequences of failing to do so. The appeal was dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>