https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97645 The Appellate Tribunal upheld the confiscation of seized and detained goods due to non-accountal and upheld the confiscation of detained goods as per legal precedents. The Tribunal reduced the redemption fines but found the penalty imposition lacking proper apportionment under different acts. The penalty on M/s. Essex Marketing was set aside due to insufficient evidence. The appeals were disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 12 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:43:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97645 The Appellate Tribunal upheld the confiscation of seized and detained goods due to non-accountal and upheld the confiscation of detained goods as per legal precedents. The Tribunal reduced the redemption fines but found the penalty imposition lacking proper apportionment under different acts. The penalty on M/s. Essex Marketing was set aside due to insufficient evidence. The appeals were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 12 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97645