<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (1) TMI 14 - TRIPURA JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER’S COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97638</link>
    <description>Commercial insolvency and loss of substratum justified winding up where the bank had ceased new business, could not meet current demands, had no reasonable prospect of profitability, and continued operations would increase losses. Balance-sheet asset surplus did not displace the commercial solvency test, which included contingent and prospective liabilities. Procedural objections failed because the petition substantially complied with prescribed requirements, curable irregularities did not invalidate it, and current-account balances constituted recoverable debts; inability to pay could also be established independently of a demand. The Tripura Administration had standing as the real creditor, and the bank was ordered to be wound up with an official liquidator appointed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:32:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (1) TMI 14 - TRIPURA JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER’S COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97638</link>
      <description>Commercial insolvency and loss of substratum justified winding up where the bank had ceased new business, could not meet current demands, had no reasonable prospect of profitability, and continued operations would increase losses. Balance-sheet asset surplus did not displace the commercial solvency test, which included contingent and prospective liabilities. Procedural objections failed because the petition substantially complied with prescribed requirements, curable irregularities did not invalidate it, and current-account balances constituted recoverable debts; inability to pay could also be established independently of a demand. The Tripura Administration had standing as the real creditor, and the bank was ordered to be wound up with an official liquidator appointed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>