<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (12) TMI 26 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97636</link>
    <description>Where a liquidator must buy a dissentient shareholder&#039;s interest, the price must be fixed on a notional sale basis taking into account assets, liabilities and other market and contractual factors; a valuation limited to a pro rata share of estimated net-asset market value is legally incorrect, and an arbitral award founded on that basis may be remitted for reconsideration under section 16(1) of the Arbitration Act. Separately, appeals against a decree entered from a revised award are not automatically incompetent where valid objections to the revision (including to remittal) were raised; here appeals were competent but dismissed on merits and costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:30:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (12) TMI 26 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97636</link>
      <description>Where a liquidator must buy a dissentient shareholder&#039;s interest, the price must be fixed on a notional sale basis taking into account assets, liabilities and other market and contractual factors; a valuation limited to a pro rata share of estimated net-asset market value is legally incorrect, and an arbitral award founded on that basis may be remitted for reconsideration under section 16(1) of the Arbitration Act. Separately, appeals against a decree entered from a revised award are not automatically incompetent where valid objections to the revision (including to remittal) were raised; here appeals were competent but dismissed on merits and costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>