<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 657 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97635</link>
    <description>An adjudication order confirming duty, penalty and director penalties could not be sustained where the assessee had not been given a reasonable opportunity to explain its case with documentary evidence. The Tribunal noted that adjournments had been sought for valid reasons and that some delay was attributable to the department, so the Commissioner should have granted further opportunity before deciding on the record alone. Because the dispute required detailed factual examination, the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after giving the assessee a reasonable hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:30:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 657 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97635</link>
      <description>An adjudication order confirming duty, penalty and director penalties could not be sustained where the assessee had not been given a reasonable opportunity to explain its case with documentary evidence. The Tribunal noted that adjournments had been sought for valid reasons and that some delay was attributable to the department, so the Commissioner should have granted further opportunity before deciding on the record alone. Because the dispute required detailed factual examination, the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after giving the assessee a reasonable hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>