<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 657 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97635</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi set aside the penalty and duty, stayed recovery, and allowed the appeals as the appellants were not given adequate opportunity to present their case and provide documentary evidence. The case was remanded to the Commissioner for a new decision, overturning the initial order that imposed penalties for clandestine clearance of galvanized MS pipes in 1997-98.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:30:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 657 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97635</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi set aside the penalty and duty, stayed recovery, and allowed the appeals as the appellants were not given adequate opportunity to present their case and provide documentary evidence. The case was remanded to the Commissioner for a new decision, overturning the initial order that imposed penalties for clandestine clearance of galvanized MS pipes in 1997-98.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>