https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97624 The case involved disputes regarding the eligibility of Modvat credit on specific capital goods, denial of credit, imposition of penalties, compliance with pre-deposit requirements, and application of waiver under section 35F of the Act. The appellate authority's handling of the case raised concerns about procedural fairness, emphasizing the importance of a thorough quasi-judicial process, consideration of waiver applications, and the application of mind in decision-making. The judgment highlighted the significance of following legal precedents, providing personal hearings, and ensuring fair and unbiased decision-making to resolve appeals effectively. en-us Fri, 08 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:01:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97624 The case involved disputes regarding the eligibility of Modvat credit on specific capital goods, denial of credit, imposition of penalties, compliance with pre-deposit requirements, and application of waiver under section 35F of the Act. The appellate authority's handling of the case raised concerns about procedural fairness, emphasizing the importance of a thorough quasi-judicial process, consideration of waiver applications, and the application of mind in decision-making. The judgment highlighted the significance of following legal precedents, providing personal hearings, and ensuring fair and unbiased decision-making to resolve appeals effectively. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97624