https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97612 The text explains the scope of relief for members under the oppression remedy in section 210, stressing that oppressive conduct is assessed in members' capacity and may be established by a sustained course of conduct rather than isolated acts. It clarifies that majority voting power does not immunise a controller who exercises that power in a burdensome, harsh or wrongful manner contrary to standards of fair dealing and company procedure. Admissions by a controller that he disregards board resolutions strengthen an oppression finding, and courts must have regard to whether the facts would also justify winding up on just and equitable grounds. en-us Mon, 17 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97612 The text explains the scope of relief for members under the oppression remedy in section 210, stressing that oppressive conduct is assessed in members' capacity and may be established by a sustained course of conduct rather than isolated acts. It clarifies that majority voting power does not immunise a controller who exercises that power in a burdensome, harsh or wrongful manner contrary to standards of fair dealing and company procedure. Admissions by a controller that he disregards board resolutions strengthen an oppression finding, and courts must have regard to whether the facts would also justify winding up on just and equitable grounds. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 17 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97612