<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (9) TMI 45 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97610</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking rectification of the register of members to remove certain individuals&#039; names, who were allegedly allotted shares improperly. The court held that rectification is a matter of judicial discretion guided by equitable principles. Applying the doctrine of indoor management, the court protected the allottees who acted in good faith. It was noted that minors holding shares was permissible. The court found no prejudice suffered by the petitioner or other shareholders due to the irregular allotments and deemed the petition mala fide. The petition was dismissed, maintaining the status quo.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:31:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (9) TMI 45 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97610</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking rectification of the register of members to remove certain individuals&#039; names, who were allegedly allotted shares improperly. The court held that rectification is a matter of judicial discretion guided by equitable principles. Applying the doctrine of indoor management, the court protected the allottees who acted in good faith. It was noted that minors holding shares was permissible. The court found no prejudice suffered by the petitioner or other shareholders due to the irregular allotments and deemed the petition mala fide. The petition was dismissed, maintaining the status quo.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>