<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 702 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97601</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as barred by time, emphasizing the lack of authority to condone delays in filing appeals under Section 35E(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for filing appeals and the Tribunal&#039;s limited power to extend such deadlines beyond what is explicitly provided in the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:25:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 702 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97601</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as barred by time, emphasizing the lack of authority to condone delays in filing appeals under Section 35E(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for filing appeals and the Tribunal&#039;s limited power to extend such deadlines beyond what is explicitly provided in the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>