https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97595 The Tribunal upheld the duty demand confirmation and reduced the penalty in an appeal concerning manufacturing goods under a brand name not eligible for exemptions. The appellants' use of another company's brand name, despite claims of agreement amendment, led to denial of benefits under Notification No. 1/93. Continuous use of the ineligible brand name post-amendment was key in the decision. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 25,000 from Rs. 50,000. Compliance with brand name regulations in manufacturing was emphasized. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit. en-us Mon, 21 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:23:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97595 The Tribunal upheld the duty demand confirmation and reduced the penalty in an appeal concerning manufacturing goods under a brand name not eligible for exemptions. The appellants' use of another company's brand name, despite claims of agreement amendment, led to denial of benefits under Notification No. 1/93. Continuous use of the ineligible brand name post-amendment was key in the decision. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 25,000 from Rs. 50,000. Compliance with brand name regulations in manufacturing was emphasized. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97595