https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97593 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity of the Registrar's actions under Section 234 of the Companies Act, 1956, despite procedural irregularities. The court found the allegations of fraud and misconduct by managing agents justified the Registrar's actions and appointment of an inspector. It clarified that the inspector's role is investigatory, not quasi-judicial, rendering bias claims irrelevant. The petition was dismissed with costs awarded to the second respondent. en-us Thu, 24 Jul 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:20:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97593 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity of the Registrar's actions under Section 234 of the Companies Act, 1956, despite procedural irregularities. The court found the allegations of fraud and misconduct by managing agents justified the Registrar's actions and appointment of an inspector. It clarified that the inspector's role is investigatory, not quasi-judicial, rendering bias claims irrelevant. The petition was dismissed with costs awarded to the second respondent. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 24 Jul 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97593