<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 693 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97591</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Allegations of clandestine removal and incorrect valuation were not supported by evidence. The Commissioner&#039;s thorough examination of records justified the decision. The Revenue&#039;s application was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:17:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 693 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97591</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Allegations of clandestine removal and incorrect valuation were not supported by evidence. The Commissioner&#039;s thorough examination of records justified the decision. The Revenue&#039;s application was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>