<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 693 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97591</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal of blades cannot be established on the basis of seizure material, production records and production norms unless the evidence is reliable and can be correlated with contemporaneous records. Here, the seized goods were re-verified, duty-paid challans supported the assessee&#039;s explanation, and discrepancies in the seizure memo were insufficient to prove clandestine clearance; the finding in favour of the assessee was upheld. Advertising and sales promotion expenditure incurred through stockists also could not be added to assessable value on the basis of assumed loading, because the stockists were independent and the materials did not show any direct or indirect additional consideration to the manufacturer; the proposed valuation addition was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:17:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 693 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97591</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal of blades cannot be established on the basis of seizure material, production records and production norms unless the evidence is reliable and can be correlated with contemporaneous records. Here, the seized goods were re-verified, duty-paid challans supported the assessee&#039;s explanation, and discrepancies in the seizure memo were insufficient to prove clandestine clearance; the finding in favour of the assessee was upheld. Advertising and sales promotion expenditure incurred through stockists also could not be added to assessable value on the basis of assumed loading, because the stockists were independent and the materials did not show any direct or indirect additional consideration to the manufacturer; the proposed valuation addition was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>