<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 692 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97590</link>
    <description>Marketability is essential for excisability: internally used interleaving trays made from defective paper boards could not be treated as separate excisable final products because no marketability evidence existed. Their non-declaration therefore did not justify denial of Modvat credit. Packing materials used as separators remained eligible inputs where their cost formed part of the final product&#039;s assessable value; Rule 57D(2) also supported their treatment as intermediate products arising during manufacture. Consequently, denial of Modvat credit and the related personal penalty were unsustainable, with consequential relief available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:14:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 692 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97590</link>
      <description>Marketability is essential for excisability: internally used interleaving trays made from defective paper boards could not be treated as separate excisable final products because no marketability evidence existed. Their non-declaration therefore did not justify denial of Modvat credit. Packing materials used as separators remained eligible inputs where their cost formed part of the final product&#039;s assessable value; Rule 57D(2) also supported their treatment as intermediate products arising during manufacture. Consequently, denial of Modvat credit and the related personal penalty were unsustainable, with consequential relief available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>