<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 692 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97590</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on interleaving trays made from misprinted and defective paper boards was examined on two points: whether the trays were excisable goods and whether credit was available when they were used as packing material. The trays were held not to be proved marketable, and mere specific dimensions did not establish excisability; accordingly, they could not be treated as an undeclared final product for denying credit. Credit was also supported because the trays functioned as packing separators and their cost was included in the assessable value of the final product, with Rule 57D(2) treating the articles as intermediate products in manufacture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:14:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 692 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97590</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on interleaving trays made from misprinted and defective paper boards was examined on two points: whether the trays were excisable goods and whether credit was available when they were used as packing material. The trays were held not to be proved marketable, and mere specific dimensions did not establish excisability; accordingly, they could not be treated as an undeclared final product for denying credit. Credit was also supported because the trays functioned as packing separators and their cost was included in the assessable value of the final product, with Rule 57D(2) treating the articles as intermediate products in manufacture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>