https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97588 An order rejecting objections to a scheme was treated as a judgment under clause 10 of the Letters Patent because it finally determined the objecting creditors' right to challenge the statutory majority and directly affected whether the scheme could proceed to sanction. On creditor voting, a corporation under the Indian Companies Act, 1913 was held not to have an implied right to vote in person at a scheme meeting absent specific statutory or rule-based authority; it could act only through proxy. Votes cast by an authorised representative without proxy were therefore invalid. en-us Fri, 16 May 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Mar 2018 12:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97588 An order rejecting objections to a scheme was treated as a judgment under clause 10 of the Letters Patent because it finally determined the objecting creditors' right to challenge the statutory majority and directly affected whether the scheme could proceed to sanction. On creditor voting, a corporation under the Indian Companies Act, 1913 was held not to have an implied right to vote in person at a scheme meeting absent specific statutory or rule-based authority; it could act only through proxy. Votes cast by an authorised representative without proxy were therefore invalid. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 16 May 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97588