<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 609 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97572</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on common inputs may be cross-utilised against duty on different declared dutiable final products without insisting on one-to-one correlation or quantum-wise apportionment. The Tribunal relied on earlier decisions and held that such utilisation was permissible under the scheme. Separately, demands covered by the first two show cause notices were remanded because a chart said to show that the disputed credit was not used for clearing the final product had not been examined, so the matter required fresh consideration after hearing the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:45:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 609 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97572</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on common inputs may be cross-utilised against duty on different declared dutiable final products without insisting on one-to-one correlation or quantum-wise apportionment. The Tribunal relied on earlier decisions and held that such utilisation was permissible under the scheme. Separately, demands covered by the first two show cause notices were remanded because a chart said to show that the disputed credit was not used for clearing the final product had not been examined, so the matter required fresh consideration after hearing the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>