https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97567 A winding-up petition and order were treated as amendable to correct a misspelt company name where the error was trifling and unlikely to mislead. The company had appeared in the misspelt name and could not rely on the defect to defeat the order. Exercising the power to waive formal defects under rule 217 of the Companies (Winding up) Rules, 1909, the court held that it could correct the petition to reflect the proper company name and the judgment debt. The petition was treated as amended, and re-advertisement was unnecessary. en-us Mon, 10 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:40:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97567 A winding-up petition and order were treated as amendable to correct a misspelt company name where the error was trifling and unlikely to mislead. The company had appeared in the misspelt name and could not rely on the defect to defeat the order. Exercising the power to waive formal defects under rule 217 of the Companies (Winding up) Rules, 1909, the court held that it could correct the petition to reflect the proper company name and the judgment debt. The petition was treated as amended, and re-advertisement was unnecessary. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 10 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97567