<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (1) TMI 22 - HIGH COURT OF ASSAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97562</link>
    <description>In winding up, liability to contribute follows membership and entry on the register, so alleged defects in allotment do not by themselves defeat contribution where the person remains shown as a member and has not obtained rectification of the register. Company records and a contemporaneous statement supported proof that the discount shares were allotted with the appellant&#039;s knowledge and consent, and any non-compliance with capital issue controls had been condoned. A plea that some shares stood in minors&#039; names also failed because the evidence showed the appellant controlled the transactions, and he could be treated as the contributory for those shares.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:21:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (1) TMI 22 - HIGH COURT OF ASSAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97562</link>
      <description>In winding up, liability to contribute follows membership and entry on the register, so alleged defects in allotment do not by themselves defeat contribution where the person remains shown as a member and has not obtained rectification of the register. Company records and a contemporaneous statement supported proof that the discount shares were allotted with the appellant&#039;s knowledge and consent, and any non-compliance with capital issue controls had been condoned. A plea that some shares stood in minors&#039; names also failed because the evidence showed the appellant controlled the transactions, and he could be treated as the contributory for those shares.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>