<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (1) TMI 20 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97559</link>
    <description>For compulsory winding up, the material date for limitation is the date of the winding up order, not the date of presentation of the petition; relation-back provisions do not extend limitation unless the statute expressly so provides, and claims time-barred as of the winding up order remain barred. Entries in a signed company balance-sheet and supporting loan schedules can constitute an acknowledgment of debt within the limitation law and thus extend limitation from the date of signing where parol or documentary evidence shows a claimant&#039;s debt is included. Applying these principles, several claimant debts were admitted as proved or within limitation by balance-sheet acknowledgment, while one claim was rejected as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:19:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (1) TMI 20 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97559</link>
      <description>For compulsory winding up, the material date for limitation is the date of the winding up order, not the date of presentation of the petition; relation-back provisions do not extend limitation unless the statute expressly so provides, and claims time-barred as of the winding up order remain barred. Entries in a signed company balance-sheet and supporting loan schedules can constitute an acknowledgment of debt within the limitation law and thus extend limitation from the date of signing where parol or documentary evidence shows a claimant&#039;s debt is included. Applying these principles, several claimant debts were admitted as proved or within limitation by balance-sheet acknowledgment, while one claim was rejected as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>