https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97554 The judgment clarified that the District Courts retained jurisdiction over pending winding up proceedings despite the repeal of the Indian Companies Act, 1913. This was due to saving clauses in the Indian Companies Act, 1956, and the General Clauses Act, 1897, which preserved the continuity of such actions under the previous statute. The court emphasized legislative intent and statutory language in protecting ongoing legal proceedings during the transition between statutes. en-us Wed, 20 Nov 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:12:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97554 The judgment clarified that the District Courts retained jurisdiction over pending winding up proceedings despite the repeal of the Indian Companies Act, 1913. This was due to saving clauses in the Indian Companies Act, 1956, and the General Clauses Act, 1897, which preserved the continuity of such actions under the previous statute. The court emphasized legislative intent and statutory language in protecting ongoing legal proceedings during the transition between statutes. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 20 Nov 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97554