https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97554 The repeal of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 did not divest District Judges of jurisdiction over winding up proceedings already pending when the Indian Companies Act, 1956 commenced. Section 647 of the 1956 Act, read with section 658 and section 6 of the General Clauses Act, preserved such proceedings, and the phrase requiring the company to be wound up in the same manner and with the same incidents was held to include the forum and procedure as well as the incidents of winding up. Pending matters therefore continued before the District Judge, and the 1956 Act was not construed as retrospectively transferring them to the High Court. en-us Wed, 20 Nov 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:12:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97554 The repeal of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 did not divest District Judges of jurisdiction over winding up proceedings already pending when the Indian Companies Act, 1956 commenced. Section 647 of the 1956 Act, read with section 658 and section 6 of the General Clauses Act, preserved such proceedings, and the phrase requiring the company to be wound up in the same manner and with the same incidents was held to include the forum and procedure as well as the incidents of winding up. Pending matters therefore continued before the District Judge, and the 1956 Act was not construed as retrospectively transferring them to the High Court. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 20 Nov 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97554