https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97543 Rectification jurisdiction was held to be wide enough to determine all questions necessary to give effect to transfer rights, and an earlier Central Government order under the appeal provision did not bar the court from entertaining the petition. A company could not refuse registration of fully paid-up shares absent an express restriction in the Act or articles, because shares were transferable property and the cited articles did not confer a general power of refusal. Objections as to genuineness, consideration, lodgment of transfer deeds, and non-joinder of transferors failed on the record, so registration was directed. en-us Sat, 07 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:52:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97543 Rectification jurisdiction was held to be wide enough to determine all questions necessary to give effect to transfer rights, and an earlier Central Government order under the appeal provision did not bar the court from entertaining the petition. A company could not refuse registration of fully paid-up shares absent an express restriction in the Act or articles, because shares were transferable property and the cited articles did not confer a general power of refusal. Objections as to genuineness, consideration, lodgment of transfer deeds, and non-joinder of transferors failed on the record, so registration was directed. Case-Laws Companies Law Sat, 07 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97543