<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 648 - CEGAT,  KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97535</link>
    <description>A lower adjudicating authority must comply with an appellate tribunal&#039;s remand direction requiring fresh measurement before refixing annual capacity production; it cannot disregard that mandate by conducting de novo proceedings on its own view of the need for reverification. If the Revenue disputed the remand direction, the proper remedy was to challenge it before the appropriate forum, not to ignore it in subsequent proceedings. An order passed in breach of the appellate mandate and judicial discipline is not sustainable, and the resulting refixation without the directed re-measurement fails.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:42:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 648 - CEGAT,  KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97535</link>
      <description>A lower adjudicating authority must comply with an appellate tribunal&#039;s remand direction requiring fresh measurement before refixing annual capacity production; it cannot disregard that mandate by conducting de novo proceedings on its own view of the need for reverification. If the Revenue disputed the remand direction, the proper remedy was to challenge it before the appropriate forum, not to ignore it in subsequent proceedings. An order passed in breach of the appellate mandate and judicial discipline is not sustainable, and the resulting refixation without the directed re-measurement fails.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>