<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (4) TMI 38 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97529</link>
    <description>The court found material defects in the presented scheme of arrangement, determining that members were not fairly represented at the meeting and asset valuation was unsubstantiated. A new meeting was ordered for reconsideration after expert valuation, scheduled for July 13, 1957, with specific procedural instructions. Fairness and reasonableness for all stakeholders were emphasized, highlighting the need for a scheme in their best interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:32:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (4) TMI 38 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97529</link>
      <description>The court found material defects in the presented scheme of arrangement, determining that members were not fairly represented at the meeting and asset valuation was unsubstantiated. A new meeting was ordered for reconsideration after expert valuation, scheduled for July 13, 1957, with specific procedural instructions. Fairness and reasonableness for all stakeholders were emphasized, highlighting the need for a scheme in their best interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>