https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97521 Jurisdiction for applications under section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956 lay with the High Court having territorial connection to the company's registered office, subject only to a valid District Court empowerment under section 10(2). A 1925 notification issued under the Indian Companies Act, 1913 was not preserved by section 645 of the 1956 Act because only orders, rules and instruments capable of being made under the new Act could continue in force. The special saving in section 645 displaced any inconsistent application of section 24 of the General Clauses Act. The jurisdictional objection based on the old notification therefore failed. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:18:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97521 Jurisdiction for applications under section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956 lay with the High Court having territorial connection to the company's registered office, subject only to a valid District Court empowerment under section 10(2). A 1925 notification issued under the Indian Companies Act, 1913 was not preserved by section 645 of the 1956 Act because only orders, rules and instruments capable of being made under the new Act could continue in force. The special saving in section 645 displaced any inconsistent application of section 24 of the General Clauses Act. The jurisdictional objection based on the old notification therefore failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 10 Apr 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97521