https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97521 The High Court asserted jurisdiction to entertain applications under section 155 of the Companies Act, rejecting the argument that the District Court at Nagpur had jurisdiction based on a 1925 notification. Justice Mudholkar emphasized the specific provisions of the Companies Act of 1956 over past notifications, ruling in favor of the High Court's jurisdiction. The court also decided against issuing a temporary injunction, ensuring no shareholder meetings would occur pending the case's resolution. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:18:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97521 The High Court asserted jurisdiction to entertain applications under section 155 of the Companies Act, rejecting the argument that the District Court at Nagpur had jurisdiction based on a 1925 notification. Justice Mudholkar emphasized the specific provisions of the Companies Act of 1956 over past notifications, ruling in favor of the High Court's jurisdiction. The court also decided against issuing a temporary injunction, ensuring no shareholder meetings would occur pending the case's resolution. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 10 Apr 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97521