<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (3) TMI 44 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97513</link>
    <description>Section 186 proceedings were treated as not excluding the court&#039;s power to make interlocutory orders needed to prevent the petition from becoming infructuous or justice from being defeated. The court read the provision as addressing directions for calling, holding and conducting the meeting, while relying on the procedural and inherent powers recognised by the Code of Civil Procedure, including sections 94 and 151, to secure substantial justice and prevent abuse of process. On the facts, the company faced possible loss if existing contracts were not performed and related payments were withheld, so the interim order was modified to permit completion of those agreements and payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:48:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (3) TMI 44 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97513</link>
      <description>Section 186 proceedings were treated as not excluding the court&#039;s power to make interlocutory orders needed to prevent the petition from becoming infructuous or justice from being defeated. The court read the provision as addressing directions for calling, holding and conducting the meeting, while relying on the procedural and inherent powers recognised by the Code of Civil Procedure, including sections 94 and 151, to secure substantial justice and prevent abuse of process. On the facts, the company faced possible loss if existing contracts were not performed and related payments were withheld, so the interim order was modified to permit completion of those agreements and payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>