https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97501 Confiscation of imported bulk drugs was upheld because the goods suffered from a labelling defect, but there was no misdeclaration of value, description, or quality. The absence of the manufacturer's label on the containers did not, by itself, establish misleading labelling, even though some containers bore the supplier's name. On that basis, the confiscation was maintained while the redemption fine and penalty were reduced, reflecting that the defect justified enforcement action but not the higher monetary consequences originally imposed. en-us Thu, 06 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:31:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97501 Confiscation of imported bulk drugs was upheld because the goods suffered from a labelling defect, but there was no misdeclaration of value, description, or quality. The absence of the manufacturer's label on the containers did not, by itself, establish misleading labelling, even though some containers bore the supplier's name. On that basis, the confiscation was maintained while the redemption fine and penalty were reduced, reflecting that the defect justified enforcement action but not the higher monetary consequences originally imposed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 06 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97501