https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97497 The court ruled in favor of the bank, allowing the claim based on a pronote to be set off against the debtor's staff security deposit. The claim was not barred by limitation as it was related to the advance against the security deposit. The defendant is entitled to pursue the balance remaining after the set-off, with no costs awarded. (HC Kerala, 1956 (12) TMI 29) en-us Wed, 19 Dec 1956 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:25:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97497 The court ruled in favor of the bank, allowing the claim based on a pronote to be set off against the debtor's staff security deposit. The claim was not barred by limitation as it was related to the advance against the security deposit. The defendant is entitled to pursue the balance remaining after the set-off, with no costs awarded. (HC Kerala, 1956 (12) TMI 29) Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 19 Dec 1956 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97497