<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 582 - CEGAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97477</link>
    <description>Tariff classification of machinery follows HSN nomenclature unless the tariff indicates a contrary intention. A vibrator motor with actuator fixed to and transmitting vibrations to the apparatus was treated as a machine having an individual function under Chapter 84.79, not as machinery for making pulp of fibrous cellulosic material under Chapter 84.39. By contrast, a sealing water system used to maintain the packing box temperature and functionally necessary for defibrator operation was held to be an integral part of the defibrator, not a separate machine of general use. The appeal therefore succeeded only on the vibrator motor classification and failed on the sealing water system.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:17:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 582 - CEGAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97477</link>
      <description>Tariff classification of machinery follows HSN nomenclature unless the tariff indicates a contrary intention. A vibrator motor with actuator fixed to and transmitting vibrations to the apparatus was treated as a machine having an individual function under Chapter 84.79, not as machinery for making pulp of fibrous cellulosic material under Chapter 84.39. By contrast, a sealing water system used to maintain the packing box temperature and functionally necessary for defibrator operation was held to be an integral part of the defibrator, not a separate machine of general use. The appeal therefore succeeded only on the vibrator motor classification and failed on the sealing water system.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>