https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97473 An application to defer dissolution remained maintainable even when filed after the three-month period from registration of the liquidator's accounts and returns, because the proviso to Section 497(5) preserved the court's power to extend the dissolution period. The court also treated earlier orders overruling the Registrar's objection as governing the matter, and noted that Section 559 independently preserved power to declare a dissolution void. The jurisdictional objection was rejected and the dissolution period was extended for six months. en-us Wed, 26 Jun 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:08:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97473 An application to defer dissolution remained maintainable even when filed after the three-month period from registration of the liquidator's accounts and returns, because the proviso to Section 497(5) preserved the court's power to extend the dissolution period. The court also treated earlier orders overruling the Registrar's objection as governing the matter, and noted that Section 559 independently preserved power to declare a dissolution void. The jurisdictional objection was rejected and the dissolution period was extended for six months. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 26 Jun 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97473