<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (12) TMI 17 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97458</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the trial court&#039;s decree in favor of the plaintiff for Rs. 1,53,665-2-0 with pendente lite and future interest at 3 percent per annum. The court found the transaction to be a binding loan, negotiated on behalf of the defendant, and supported by the doctrines of internal management, benefit, and ratification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:36:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (12) TMI 17 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97458</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the trial court&#039;s decree in favor of the plaintiff for Rs. 1,53,665-2-0 with pendente lite and future interest at 3 percent per annum. The court found the transaction to be a binding loan, negotiated on behalf of the defendant, and supported by the doctrines of internal management, benefit, and ratification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>