<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (11) TMI 15 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97454</link>
    <description>The winding up of a banking company is governed primarily by the special scheme in the Banking Companies Act, 1949, which operates as a self-contained code and is not displaced by the general liquidation provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 except where consistent. In that statutory setting, the absence of a court liquidator under the Companies Act does not make the general regime controlling. The court may lawfully accept the Reserve Bank&#039;s nominated person as official liquidator, and due weight should be given to the Reserve Bank&#039;s selection. The appointment of the nominated liquidator was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:28:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (11) TMI 15 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97454</link>
      <description>The winding up of a banking company is governed primarily by the special scheme in the Banking Companies Act, 1949, which operates as a self-contained code and is not displaced by the general liquidation provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 except where consistent. In that statutory setting, the absence of a court liquidator under the Companies Act does not make the general regime controlling. The court may lawfully accept the Reserve Bank&#039;s nominated person as official liquidator, and due weight should be given to the Reserve Bank&#039;s selection. The appointment of the nominated liquidator was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>