<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (9) TMI 27 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97442</link>
    <description>A reference of an industrial dispute under section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act was treated as an independent statutory power of the appropriate Government and was not made subject to prior leave under section 171 of the Companies Act, 1913 after winding up. Proceedings under sections 33 and 33A were held maintainable against the employer at the time of the impugned discharge or service action, even if that party was not the employer when the original reference was made. The company&#039;s continued legal existence after winding up, together with notice to the official liquidator, meant that the reference and later proceedings were not invalid for non-impleading the liquidator.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:09:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (9) TMI 27 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97442</link>
      <description>A reference of an industrial dispute under section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act was treated as an independent statutory power of the appropriate Government and was not made subject to prior leave under section 171 of the Companies Act, 1913 after winding up. Proceedings under sections 33 and 33A were held maintainable against the employer at the time of the impugned discharge or service action, even if that party was not the employer when the original reference was made. The company&#039;s continued legal existence after winding up, together with notice to the official liquidator, meant that the reference and later proceedings were not invalid for non-impleading the liquidator.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>