<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 377 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97441</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed 14 appeals challenging the inclusion of advertisement and sales promotion expenses in the assessable value of goods. It emphasized the need for specific agreements between parties and accurate duty calculations based on approved price lists. The Tribunal upheld the earlier judgment, distinguishing it from a Supreme Court decision, and directed the Asstt. Commissioner to recalculate duty considering the advertisement expenses. The Asstt. Commissioner&#039;s competence was affirmed, as the case did not fall under the exclusion clause of a CBEC Circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:09:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 377 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97441</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed 14 appeals challenging the inclusion of advertisement and sales promotion expenses in the assessable value of goods. It emphasized the need for specific agreements between parties and accurate duty calculations based on approved price lists. The Tribunal upheld the earlier judgment, distinguishing it from a Supreme Court decision, and directed the Asstt. Commissioner to recalculate duty considering the advertisement expenses. The Asstt. Commissioner&#039;s competence was affirmed, as the case did not fall under the exclusion clause of a CBEC Circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>